Search This Blog
Tuesday, 12 October 2010
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
Fish Tank
Peter Bradshaw
In this film, Andrea Arnold has demonstrated her mastery and fluency in the social-realist idiom, and simply makes it fizz with life. Having now watched Fish Tank a second time, I am more exhilarated than ever by Arnold's idealism, and in a movie marketplace where so much is vapidly cynical, this is a mistral of fresh air. Arnold finds a way into the fashionable notion of a "Broken Britain", but in place of the pundits' dismay and contempt, she offers tenderness and hope. If Ken Loach were ever somehow called on constitutionally to nominate a successor, it would surely have to be Arnold. She's got the grit; she has Loach's humanism and optimism and she has a happy knack of getting great performances out of her cast, particularly from Michael Fassbender, who proves that he's not just sex on a stick – he's complexity and vulnerability on a stick as well. Added to this, Arnold and her cinematographer, Robbie Ryan, conjure some glorious, almost Turner-ish images of the Essex countryside, with its racing summer skies.
- Fish Tank
- Production year: 2009
- Country: UK
- Cert (UK): 15
- Runtime: 124 mins
- Directors: Andrea Arnold, Andrea Arnold
- Cast: Harry Treadaway, Jason Maza, Katie Jarvis, Kierston Wareing, Michael Fassbender, Rebecca Griffiths
Their torpid lives are disrupted when Mia's mother miraculously gets a new boyfriend, Connor: and Fassbender gives his best performance yet. Connor is funny, sexy, confident and utterly relaxed where everyone else appears clenched with resentment. Noticeably articulate, Connor appears to come from a marginally more middle-class world and he is also, tellingly, a breadwinner. Mia rifles through his wallet while he's upstairs with her mum and instead of immediately nicking the cash, she gazes fascinated at his payslips: a man who actually works for a living. How many of those has she ever met?
Without consciously realising it, Mia is hoping that Connor could be a father-figure, and both sisters are secretly thrilled when he takes them all out for a drive in the country, and shows them how he can catch a fish with his bare hands. While her mother and sister cringe on the riverbank, Mia wades out into the cold, slimy water to help him and Tyler squeaks: "Is it minging?"
No, it is not minging. It is sensual and exciting, an exotic experience such as Mia has never known. And it marks the decisive point at which Connor and Mia's relationship drifts past being that of a quasi-father and daughter. Connor even takes an interest in her dancing, and casually lends her his expensive camcorder to tape an audition for a local competition, trusting that he will get it back. "You dance like a black," he tells her, with studied, flirtatious insolence. "I mean it as a compliment."
Mia has an enormous, poignant capacity for love, but she has never received any, certainly not from a damaged mother, whose one moment of intimacy with her daughter comes when she ferociously tells Mia that she was thinking of having her aborted. So she has no idea how to express or manage love and it is her muddled, suspicious longing for the safety and comfort of a father's care that makes the situation so explosive. As for Connor, it is far from clear how much baggage he has: he moves in to Mia's mum's flat because he says his own mother has thrown him out and often has to take calls from his "mum", but what is really going on? It becomes all too clear that if Mia has her own issues about family, then so does Connor – whose secrets are shabbier and more poisonous than either Mia or her mother could have realised.
The situation heralds an unwatchably tense finale as Mia's adoration turns into anger and then a determination to survive, to outgrow her surroundings, and to forgive. Arnold shows us that what makes the relationship between Mia and Connor so transgressive is not their obvious sexual attraction but their quite genuine, if thwarted and delusional longing to be father and daughter.
Jarvis has given a wonderfully honest and open performance to be compared with David Bradley in Kes, or Émilie Dequenne in the Dardenne brothers' Rosetta. Her relationship with Fassbender is what gives the film its beating heart.
Precious
- Precious: Based on the Novel Push By Sapphire
- Production year: 2009
- Country: USA
- Cert (UK): 15
- Runtime: 109 mins
- Directors: Lee Daniels
- Cast: Gabourey 'Gabby' Sidibe, Gabourey Sidibe, Lenny Kravitz, Mariah Carey, Mo'Nique, Paula Patton
Set in 1987, and based on the novel Push by the Harlem poet and author Sapphire, it is about an obese, taciturn African-American teenager called Precious, who has had two babies, the result of being repeatedly raped by her father. One of these children has Down's syndrome, and Precious calls him Mongo, short for "Mongoloid" – that discredited term Precious uncomprehendingly overheard and liked.
Her mother Mary, the rapist's partner, takes out her self-hate in repeated spasms of grotesquely jealous rage against Precious, routinely subjecting her to violent assaults and screaming abuse: "You're a dummy, bitch! You will never know shit, don't nobody want you, don't nobody need you! You done fucked around and fucked my mother-fuckin' man and had two motherfuckin' children; one of them was a god-damned animal runnin' around lookin' crazy as a motherfucker ... I shoulda aborted your ass!"
Even when Precious begins to overcome this abuse through special educational classes – in which she has been enrolled by a sharp-eyed teacher who has spotted her talent for mathematics – and even found a measure of articulacy through burgeoning happiness and self-esteem, she receives news of a terrible new burden of woe in the movie's final act.
Undoubtedly, the heartfelt lead performance from newcomer Gabourey Sidibe is a powerful spectacle. Her mother is well played by the comedian Mo'Nique, who creates a monster of cruelty and sadism, and has a chillingly comic moment when the welfare inspector comes round to her apartment and she must transform herself into a husky-voiced paragon of caring respectability.
Paula Patton plays Precious's unfeasibly beautiful and caring teacher in the special class and Mariah Carey has a no-makeup and bling-free role, playing Precious's social worker, a grumpy sceptical badass, who is nevertheless reduced to tears by the final, cathartic three-way facedown with Precious and her mother.
The most important figure is, however, the one who never appears on camera: the executive producer is Oprah Winfrey, to whose movie debut this film appears to allude, not all that subtly, when Precious's teacher asks the class what their favourite colours are: her own is purple. There are motivational posters all over the place, urging commitment and self-belief, and we get a glimpse of one featuring Winfrey herself, on the importance of reading.
Winfrey's subliminal brand-identity was not, however, the drawback. What I found disconcerting was the extreme shift of tone between the extravagantly nightmarish, and the inspirationally upbeat. The horrendous unending nightmare of abuse that Precious suffers, made somehow worse by her agonisingly poignant daydreams of red-carpet celebrity, suddenly gives way to easier-going and even faintly sitcom-ish class scenes with a pre-packaged cast of unthreatening kids in the new school, tricked out with all manner of picturesque street-cred mannerisms. What with the accents, the leg-warmers and the yearning for success in the music industry, the film it suddenly resembles is Fame.
Precious can't help the racism that may be coming her way on account of the colour of her skin, or the sexist jibes from nasty guys on street corners, and she certainly can't help the rape and abuse she suffered. But how about being fat? Isn't it bad for her? Aren't any of these caring teachers going to mention heart disease, or talk to Precious about overeating as addiction, or as the symptom of abuse? I had the uneasy sense that her body mass index was being tacitly treated as part of her cultural identity, and not to be questioned.
Well, the character is supposed to have been through sheer hell, and teachers and healthcare professionals in this situation might conceivably decide to ease off on the question of weight for a bit.
That beautiful, inspirational teacher of hers (who is naturally as thin as a rake) actually encourages Precious to eat some more when she is round at her comfortable, middle-class professional home – because she feels hungry!
There is no doubting the raucous, tactless energy of the film, and the brilliantly brutal performance from Mo'Nique. It isn't the transcendent masterpiece that some admirers would have you believe: more like a black-comic nightmare that isn't exactly supposed to be funny. It's certainly arresting, though.
Friday, 17 September 2010
Kidulthood
Review
Featuring bullying, casual sex, hard drug abuse, complete disregard for authority, organized crime and even murder, if ever a film wanted an ASBO more than an Oscar, it's Kidulthood. Wearing its multiracial "messed-up youth" mantra as a badge of honour, this seems - at first glance - to be a deliberate assault on Middle England values.
Writer-star Noel Clarke is having none of it, saying the film, directed by former music video and commercials maker Menhaj Huda, isn't meant to be controversial. Still, if you spent half a year tearing out the most unpleasant stories from around the country, pasted them all into one colour supplement - complete with a free cutting-edge hip-hop and 'grime' soundtrack - and held it up as a state-of-the-nation report, the dreadfully-titled Kidulthood would be the result.
Making social commentary out of such exceptional events is problematic at best. On one hand you've got Trife (Ameen), caught between pregnant ex-girlfriend Alisa (Madrell) and gunrunning for his malevolent uncle. Then there's Trife's mates Jay (Deacon) and Moony (Oyeniran), spoiling for a fight with neighbourhood bully Sam (Clarke), Jay going so far as to steal Sam's abused girlfriend (Fairley). Meanwhile Alisa's best friend Becky is going around the area granting sexual favours in exchange for cocaine. And Lenny (Spall), the brother of classmate Kate, who killed herself 10 minutes into the film, is seeking revenge on the bullies who drove her to suicide. By the way, most of these kids are fifteen years old. No one plot strand above is perhaps impossible, but collapsed into one whole it verges on hysterical.
Writer-star Noel Clarke is having none of it, saying the film, directed by former music video and commercials maker Menhaj Huda, isn't meant to be controversial. Still, if you spent half a year tearing out the most unpleasant stories from around the country, pasted them all into one colour supplement - complete with a free cutting-edge hip-hop and 'grime' soundtrack - and held it up as a state-of-the-nation report, the dreadfully-titled Kidulthood would be the result.
Making social commentary out of such exceptional events is problematic at best. On one hand you've got Trife (Ameen), caught between pregnant ex-girlfriend Alisa (Madrell) and gunrunning for his malevolent uncle. Then there's Trife's mates Jay (Deacon) and Moony (Oyeniran), spoiling for a fight with neighbourhood bully Sam (Clarke), Jay going so far as to steal Sam's abused girlfriend (Fairley). Meanwhile Alisa's best friend Becky is going around the area granting sexual favours in exchange for cocaine. And Lenny (Spall), the brother of classmate Kate, who killed herself 10 minutes into the film, is seeking revenge on the bullies who drove her to suicide. By the way, most of these kids are fifteen years old. No one plot strand above is perhaps impossible, but collapsed into one whole it verges on hysterical.
The contrivances are all the more frustrating because when Kidulthood steers away from its tabloid-baiting antics to concentrate on more typical teenage struggles it is convincing. Clarke's screenplay teems with authentic modern slang and is filled with telling observations: how (lack of) sexual prowess is a potent tool to blackmail or shame a person; the fine line between fitting in or being true to yourself; how adults are often peripheral figures in a teenager's life; and the racial stereotyping that goes hand in hand with minority groups in urban areas. As hoodie-wearing Moony points out when he can't get a taxi, "ain't that ironic - black cab don't take black man."
The cast of near-unknowns, including the offspring of actors Ray Winstone (Jamie) and Timothy Spall (Rafe) handle their unlikable roles well, and the soundtrack, featuring artists like Dizzee Rascal and The Streets, hits home, even if director Huda's handling of the music, and shifts in his story's tone lacks nuance. Veteran Trainspotting cinematographer Brian Tufano helps add a persuasive, fresh look to the West London locations.
The cast of near-unknowns, including the offspring of actors Ray Winstone (Jamie) and Timothy Spall (Rafe) handle their unlikable roles well, and the soundtrack, featuring artists like Dizzee Rascal and The Streets, hits home, even if director Huda's handling of the music, and shifts in his story's tone lacks nuance. Veteran Trainspotting cinematographer Brian Tufano helps add a persuasive, fresh look to the West London locations.
Bullet Boy
Reviewed by Adrian Hennigan
Gun culture goes under the microscope in Bullet Boy, Saul Dibb's powerful and moving directorial debut. Ashley Walters (aka So Solid Crew's Asher D) and newcomer Luke Fraser deliver compelling performances in this low-budget British drama, about a freshly-released jailbird who struggles to go straight on the mean streets of Hackney. On paper the clichés stack up like one of the film's high rise flats; on celluloid the movie overcomes its hackneyed plotline to deliver an all-too-believable message about the impact of firearms on a family.Dibb's documentary past shines through here, as he goes beyond sensationalist headlines to examine the chilling domestic repercussions of packing a gun. Eighteen-year-old Ricky (Walters) doesn't have to go looking for trouble; it knows where to find him. On his way home from a young offender's institute with hotheaded pal Wisdom (Leon Black), his life collides - literally - with two rival kids from the neighbourhood (Clark Lawson, Jadiel Vitalis). Following an unresolved stand-off, the situation spirals completely out of control - in ways that will impact upon pet dogs and the whole of Ricky's family, particularly younger brother Curtis (Fraser).
"CLOSER IN SPIRIT TO LA HAINE AND KES"
The black characters and urban setting invite lazy comparisons to John Singleton's 1991 drama Boyz N The Hood. Bullet Boy, however, is closer in spirit to hard-hitting French pic La Haine (1995) and Ken Loach's depiction of lost innocence, Kes (1969). Sharing the compassion of Loach's best movies, Dibb's film becomes less about Ricky's desperate attempts to avoid his fate, and more about the effect the lethal weapon has on his impressionable young sibling.
A sensitive look at an incendiary subject, Bullet Boy really hits the mark.
Wednesday, 15 September 2010
This is England 86
http://www.channel4.com/explore/this-is-england-86/
For anyone who sniffs that television is a dumb or trivial medium, Shane Meadows has provided the perfect riposte: This Is England '86 (Channel 4), the director’s four-part follow-up to his acclaimed 2006 film This Is England. Its second episode aired last night and it is developing into a compelling TV drama which mixes light-hearted humour with a real depth of feeling.
The original film told the story of Shaun (Thomas Turgoose), a fatherless 12 year-old who fell in with a group of apolitical teenage skinheads in 1983. Their happy-go-lucky world collapsed when Combo, an older gang member, returned from jail, bringing racist violence with him. Set three years on, the TV series picked up last week as if the characters had been growing up in the background, with most of the original cast reprising their roles.
Whereas the film focused on the single, dark narrative of Shaun’s experience, the series allows Meadows to range more widely. So while Shaun – who fails his CSEs and gets a short-lived job renting out VHS videos (“These are the future!”) – is still a key character, the first two episodes told the story of Lol (Vicky McClure) and Woody (Joe Gilgun). A likeable couple, they perfectly captured that twentysomething teetering between rebellion and respectability.
Their alternative wedding – the bride wore Doc Martens – flopped when Woody couldn’t say his vows; by the end of episode two Lol’s troubled past was prising them apart. One of the most powerful scenes of the series so far was when she confronted her abusive father, whom her mother had welcomed back under the pretext that he had “changed”. “Changed how?” she asked. “Changed his haircut? Changed his socks?”
As ever with Meadows, there is a deft – and sometimes unsettling – balance of the tragic and the comic. The first two episodes have already provided many laugh-out-loud moments. “Mummy will be with you in one minute. I’ll bring you some milk and biscuits,” simpered a woman caught in flagrante, looking anything but maternal, by her young son. Also possessing an amusing lack of self-awareness was a nasty little oik who made Shaun knock on a girl’s door and insult her so that he could rush to her defence – if Shaun refused, he would beat him up. “She thinks I’m a bully,” he justified himself. “This will show her I’m sensitive.”
The shift to the small screen has not compromised Meadows’s artistic touch. He is the master of that creative writing mantra, “show, don’t tell”, lacing this series with images which communicate far more than many a laboured bit of dialogue. A “dole not coal” pin badge nodded to the context; the sight of Lol
in the shower, water cascading from her cropped hair to the nape of her neck, suggested the vulnerability beneath her toughness. There is, however, the occasional overlap in the imagery which might start to grate as the series wears on. In episode one, we saw the crazy young things racing wheelchairs down a hospital corridor; in episode two they hijacked two golf buggies for yet more mobilised hi-jinks.
Still, with Combo set to return, the drama is likely to take a turn for the darker. This Is England was a provocative title for the film, suggesting that national identity was tied up with lost innocence and bigotry. In the follow-up, the same gang again looks as though it will be torn apart, but this time by infidelity rather than racist hatred. If this suggests a gloomy take on the national psyche, there is much more going on here: Meadows captures a certain camaraderie, coarseness, irony and warmth that are distinctly English, and make for distinctly good television.
By Ceri Radford
Their alternative wedding – the bride wore Doc Martens – flopped when Woody couldn’t say his vows; by the end of episode two Lol’s troubled past was prising them apart. One of the most powerful scenes of the series so far was when she confronted her abusive father, whom her mother had welcomed back under the pretext that he had “changed”. “Changed how?” she asked. “Changed his haircut? Changed his socks?”
As ever with Meadows, there is a deft – and sometimes unsettling – balance of the tragic and the comic. The first two episodes have already provided many laugh-out-loud moments. “Mummy will be with you in one minute. I’ll bring you some milk and biscuits,” simpered a woman caught in flagrante, looking anything but maternal, by her young son. Also possessing an amusing lack of self-awareness was a nasty little oik who made Shaun knock on a girl’s door and insult her so that he could rush to her defence – if Shaun refused, he would beat him up. “She thinks I’m a bully,” he justified himself. “This will show her I’m sensitive.”
The shift to the small screen has not compromised Meadows’s artistic touch. He is the master of that creative writing mantra, “show, don’t tell”, lacing this series with images which communicate far more than many a laboured bit of dialogue. A “dole not coal” pin badge nodded to the context; the sight of Lol
in the shower, water cascading from her cropped hair to the nape of her neck, suggested the vulnerability beneath her toughness. There is, however, the occasional overlap in the imagery which might start to grate as the series wears on. In episode one, we saw the crazy young things racing wheelchairs down a hospital corridor; in episode two they hijacked two golf buggies for yet more mobilised hi-jinks.
Still, with Combo set to return, the drama is likely to take a turn for the darker. This Is England was a provocative title for the film, suggesting that national identity was tied up with lost innocence and bigotry. In the follow-up, the same gang again looks as though it will be torn apart, but this time by infidelity rather than racist hatred. If this suggests a gloomy take on the national psyche, there is much more going on here: Meadows captures a certain camaraderie, coarseness, irony and warmth that are distinctly English, and make for distinctly good television.
By Ceri Radford
Wednesday, 26 May 2010
Shifty
The British urban movie may still be in its infancy, or rather its ungainly adolescence, with more pose and front than actual script and performance. However, first-time director Eran Creevy kicks things up a notch with this shrewd and engaging drama, achieved on the smallest of budgets. Bullet Boy and the Kidulthood films had their points, certainly, but it seems to me that Shifty is better: more relaxed, less macho (though very male) and not so lazily reliant on the usual tragi-grandiloquent violent ending.
Riz Ahmed and Daniel Mays give excellent performances as two mates uneasily reunited after a long time apart. Mays plays Chris, a young guy who is on the career and property ladder in Manchester with a job in recruitment. He returns to his old London neighbourhood for the first time in years, intending to stay with his childhood best friend Shifty (Riz Ahmed), who is living in his brother's house. This is Rez (Nitin Ganatra), an observant Muslim who knows nothing of Shifty's main business in life, but which is all too obvious to Chris the moment he clocks the pricey audio and computer equipment in his bedroom. Shifty is making a lot of money selling hard drugs.
While Chris has been making his way in respectable corporate life, Shifty has been drifting further into a very dangerous world: but it appears from the excruciating atmosphere over breakfast that it is Chris who is the bad guy. He caused bad feelings when he mysteriously left his old stamping grounds without saying goodbye, and it's also clear that he is not entirely free of connections with drug-dealing either. Making the best of a difficult situation, Chris agrees to accompany his friend on his daily supply rounds, and the tensions become plain: Shifty must deal with a supplier, the sinister Glen (Jason Flemyng) and below him on the drug food chain is a wretched labourer called Trevor (Jay Simpson), a whining addict to whom Shifty has sold merchandise and perhaps even tried to sub-contract a coke-dealing business on building sites, a plan that has gone horribly wrong.
Chemistry between actors is a difficult thing to conjure up, but Ahmed and Mays, without trying very hard - and really without very much in the way of dialogue - are instantly persuasive as twentysomething guys who are sentimentally loyal to their earlier friendship and their childhood selves, but wary of the way their fledgling adult lives could be destroyed by hanging on to the past. Chris's own motives are hard to read: does he want to save Shifty? To apologise to him, man to man? Or to reach back into the past, and reclaim the intimacy they had as boys? The ending of this movie is a little contrived, but it ties things up satisfactorily. This is smart work from Creevy, who is a film-maker to watch.
While Chris has been making his way in respectable corporate life, Shifty has been drifting further into a very dangerous world: but it appears from the excruciating atmosphere over breakfast that it is Chris who is the bad guy. He caused bad feelings when he mysteriously left his old stamping grounds without saying goodbye, and it's also clear that he is not entirely free of connections with drug-dealing either. Making the best of a difficult situation, Chris agrees to accompany his friend on his daily supply rounds, and the tensions become plain: Shifty must deal with a supplier, the sinister Glen (Jason Flemyng) and below him on the drug food chain is a wretched labourer called Trevor (Jay Simpson), a whining addict to whom Shifty has sold merchandise and perhaps even tried to sub-contract a coke-dealing business on building sites, a plan that has gone horribly wrong.
Chemistry between actors is a difficult thing to conjure up, but Ahmed and Mays, without trying very hard - and really without very much in the way of dialogue - are instantly persuasive as twentysomething guys who are sentimentally loyal to their earlier friendship and their childhood selves, but wary of the way their fledgling adult lives could be destroyed by hanging on to the past. Chris's own motives are hard to read: does he want to save Shifty? To apologise to him, man to man? Or to reach back into the past, and reclaim the intimacy they had as boys? The ending of this movie is a little contrived, but it ties things up satisfactorily. This is smart work from Creevy, who is a film-maker to watch.
Monday, 26 April 2010
Wednesday, 31 March 2010
Monday, 29 March 2010
This is England
http://www.thisisenglandmovie.co.uk/
Peter Bradshaw The Guardian, Friday 27 April 2007 Article history
Cutting edge... Shane Meadows' This is England
Shane Meadows continues his fast and fluent film-making career with this quasi-autobiographical picture about skinheads: a movie with hints of Alan Clarke's Made in Britain and, in its final image, the haunted disenchantment of Truffaut's The 400 Blows. It is a sad, painful and sometimes funny story from the white working classes of 1980s Britain, the cannon-fodder caste alienated from Falklands rejoicing on the home front and not invited to participate in the nation's promised service-economy prosperity.
This Is EnglandProduction year: 2006Country: UKCert (UK): 18Runtime: 100 minsDirectors: Shane MeadowsCast: Jo Hartley, Jo Hartley, Joe Gilgun, Stephen Graham, Thomas TurgooseMore on this filmMeadows boldly attempts to reclaim the skinhead from the traditional neo-Nazi image, explicitly distinguishing his characters from a separate racist influence, and presenting them as an anarchic youth tribe that idolised West Indian music. He sees their susceptibility to the extremist right as a poignant and even tragic part of their fatherless culture, literally and figuratively orphaned by the times.
There's a winning lead performance from 13-year-old newcomer Thomas Turgoose playing a put-upon lad called Shaun in the run-down Grimsby of 1983. His dad was a serviceman killed in the Falklands and he's perennially getting picked on for this, and for his horrible flared jeans which make him look, as one bully cruelly puts it, like Keith Chegwin's son. Sloping and moping his way home after a standard-issue school day of humiliation, Shaun gets waylaid by some skins in a dodgy underpass, but instead of yet more battering, the gang give him sympathy and understanding; they become Shaun's only friends, and with a new Ben Sherman shirt and number one cut, Shaun has new pride and a new identity.
The gang's leader is Woody - a cheerful, sparky performance from Joe Gilgun - and they have an African-Caribbean member facetiously nicknamed Milky, played by Meadows regular Andrew Shim; Shaun even finds romance with one of the group's girl-punk fellow travellers: a languid and rather elegant older woman called Smell (Rosamund Hanson) who earnestly explains to Shaun's mum that she is called that simply because it rhymes with Michelle. The idyll is soon destroyed with the highly unwelcome appearance of Combo, a ferocious and sinister skin warrior just out of prison, played by Stephen Graham. He demands the group join his National Front cell, and turn out for an NF meeting in a tatty pub, addressed by one of the movement's suit-wearing officer class, played in cameo by Frank Harper.
Turgoose is the picture's heart and soul, and it's a terrifically natural, easy and commanding performance. Turgoose's open face radiates charm, and then, when he goes over to the dark side of racism, a creepy, anti-cherubic scorn: almost like one of the little blond kids in Village of the Damned. But Meadows is always concerned to preserve a sympathetic core to Shaun, and in fact to all the skins. Even the deeply objectionable Combo is shown to be suffering from emotional pain.
Like Meadows' earlier pictures, Dead Man's Shoes and A Room for Romeo Brass, This Is England is about younger, vulnerable figures being taken under the wing of older, flawed men, and this personal theme here finds its richest and maturest expression yet. As to whether we should buy its implied leniency about skinhead culture: that is another question. The West Indian influence is advanced as proof that skins were not necessarily racist: yet it can't cancel out Combo's hate campaign against South Asians, the "Pakis" who "smell of curry", a campaign which goes quite unchallenged or even unremarked upon by any of the skins, good or bad.
The skinhead identity is, after all, obviously supposed to be more aggressive than that of other tribes: I remember as a 10-year-old cowering on the terraces of Watford football club in the early 70s, as the Luton boot boys got stuck in, and my father grimly telling me that the reason they shaved their heads that way was so the coppers couldn't grab them by the hair. Whether or not that is true, it certainly made the wearer's head look like a big, third clenched fist. And it's still difficult to get a handle on them.
Meadows appears to want to find emotional truths behind the bravado, to find reasons for the male rage. It's a valid quest, and there are telling and touching moments, particularly between Turgoose and Rosamund Hanson. I found myself wishing that their love story could occupy more of the film, maybe for the same reason that the Shane Meadows film I have enjoyed most is the one his real fans loathe: the comedy Once Upon a Time in the Midlands. But from the get-go of this drama, it is obvious that things are heading only one way: towards a climactic flourish of violence, and it's a glum business wondering to whom and from whom this is going to happen. This is a violent subject, and these are violent people, and yet I couldn't help feeling that Meadows is, as so often, more comfortable with machismo than with the humour and gentleness which play a smaller, yet intensely welcome part of his movies. However agnostic I confess to still feeling about his work, there's no doubt that Meadows is a real film-maker with a growing and evolving career, and with his own natural cinematic language. When I think of his films, I think, for good or ill: this is English cinema.
Monday, 22 March 2010
Recommended books
D. Hebdige Subculture: The meaning of Style
R. Murphy (Ed) British Cinema of the 90s
R. Murphy (Ed) British Cinema of the 90s
Monday, 15 March 2010
Introduction to Section B
G325 Section B: Contemporary Media Issues
Section requirements
One question to be answered from six topics. Two questions offered for each six topic. 50 marks for the question. 1 hour to complete.
You must understand contemporary media texts, industries, audiences and debates.
You need to write academically about perspectives in media and culture, referencing examples, theories and arguments.
Understanding of contemporary issues must contain reference to two media and a range of texts, industries, audiences and debates.
Each topic has 4 prompt questions and you must be prepared to answer an exam question that relates to 1 or more of these prompts.
Reference should be made to the past, present and future in relation to the topic, with emphasis on the contemporary.
We are covering two topics:
1 Contemporary Media Regulation.
2 Media and Collective Identity.
And the two media we are covering are Film and TV.
The key prompt questions for Contemporary Media Regulation are:
1 What is the nature of contemporary media regulation compared with previous practices?
2 What are the arguments for and against specific forms of contemporary media regulation?
3 How effective are regulatory practices?
4 What are the wider social issues relating to media regulation?
The key prompt questions for Media and Collective Identity are:
1 How does the contemporary media represent nations, regions, and ethnic/social/collective groups of people in different ways?
2 How does contemporary representation compare to different time periods?
3 What are the social implications of different representations of groups of people?
4 To what extent is human identity increasingly mediated?
Section requirements
One question to be answered from six topics. Two questions offered for each six topic. 50 marks for the question. 1 hour to complete.
You must understand contemporary media texts, industries, audiences and debates.
You need to write academically about perspectives in media and culture, referencing examples, theories and arguments.
Understanding of contemporary issues must contain reference to two media and a range of texts, industries, audiences and debates.
Each topic has 4 prompt questions and you must be prepared to answer an exam question that relates to 1 or more of these prompts.
Reference should be made to the past, present and future in relation to the topic, with emphasis on the contemporary.
We are covering two topics:
1 Contemporary Media Regulation.
2 Media and Collective Identity.
And the two media we are covering are Film and TV.
The key prompt questions for Contemporary Media Regulation are:
1 What is the nature of contemporary media regulation compared with previous practices?
2 What are the arguments for and against specific forms of contemporary media regulation?
3 How effective are regulatory practices?
4 What are the wider social issues relating to media regulation?
The key prompt questions for Media and Collective Identity are:
1 How does the contemporary media represent nations, regions, and ethnic/social/collective groups of people in different ways?
2 How does contemporary representation compare to different time periods?
3 What are the social implications of different representations of groups of people?
4 To what extent is human identity increasingly mediated?
Saturday, 13 March 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)